Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 U.S. 447 - Davidson v. Lanier

Davidson v. Lanier’s Empirical Analysis

71 U.S. 447 · 1866

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
August 1983
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1983 · most notably Cooper Manuf'G Co of Mount Vernon Ohio v. Ferguson (1885), Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. Dow (1887)

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 19 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1301866187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rutherford v. Geddes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “•“The delivery of a bill of exchange signed and indorsed in blank only authorizes the receiver, as between himself and the drawer and indorser, to fill it up in conformity with the authority given him. If there has been no agreement, the authority is general; if there has, it must be pursued. The burden of proof that there was an agreement and that its terms have been violated is, in such a case, upon the defendant; but if he can make the proof it will avail him. No person, unless authorized, either directly or by just inference from the nature of the transaction, can fill up a blank bill for its own benefit. Nor can such a bill be enforced against the drawer and indorser in favor of anyone who takes it in bad faith; that is, with knowledge that it has been filled up without authority or in fraud. 3 Kent Com., 119; 19 Sm. & Marsh. 590.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to erect, establish, institute or put in operation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.