Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 U.S. 522 - Commissioner of Patents v. Whiteley

Commissioner of Patents v. Whiteley’s Empirical Analysis

71 U.S. 522 · 1866

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2014 · most notably Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad (1893), Wilbur v. United States ex rel. Kadrie (1930)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

1301866187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moffitt v. Garr · United States v. Dashiel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court cannot entertain an appeal from the decision of one of the secretaries, nor revise his judgment in any case where the law authorizes him to exercise judgment or discretion, nor can it, by mandamus, act directly upon an officer, or guide or control Ills judgment or discretion in a matter committed to Ms care in the ordinary exercise of his official duties. Hie interference of the court with the performance of the ordinary duties of the executive department would be productive of nothing lmt mischief. We are quite satisfied that no such power was ever intended to be given to them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “mandamus would clearly lie to compel the Commissioner to receive it. It was. his first duty to receive the application. Whatever he might do subsequentiy, without this initial step there could be\no examination, and, indeed, no rightful knowledge of the subject on his part. Examination and the exercise of judgmént, with, their proper fruit, were to follow, and they did follow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that there should be a remedy to enforce every right”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.