Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Utah 134 - State v. Hale

State v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 1977
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1977

7 state decisions

50192719301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Topham · State v. Sheffield · State v. Hoben · State v. Pay · State v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purposes of a complaint are twofold: To advise the defendant of the charge made against him; and to enable the committing magistrate to determine whether or not the defendant should be bound over to the district court to stand trial for the offense charged in the complaint.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.