Skeen v. Van Sickle’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1932
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The cause is therefore remanded to the trial court, with directions to make findings upon the issue to which we have referred, and if deemed necessary, to take further evidence and allow amendments to the pleadings in the discretion of the court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Skeen v. Van Sickle““that is, what they agreed to as between them and the other heirs including the plaintiffs here as alleged in the complaint.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Skeen v. Van Sickle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.