Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Wash. 2d 372 - State v. Green

71 Wash. 2d 372 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably In Re Davis (2004), 61 Wash. App. 354 - State v. Casteneda-Perez (1991)

2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

1101967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 43 Wash. 2d 47 - State v. Thorne · 70 Wash. 2d 27 - State v. Morris · 52 Wash. 2d 721 - State v. Griffith · 35 Wash. 2d 379 - State v. Brown · 52 Wash. 2d 684 - Nelson v. Martinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Q. What kind of gloves were you wearing when you were arrested, Mr. Green? A. Black gloves. Q. Both gloves? A. Yes. Q. And the officers were mistaken when they said one was black and one was a pigskin glove? A. I'm sure they were. Q. Or lying. As a matter of fact, Mr. Green, if I believe your testimony, we have to — Mr. Hemmen: I object. The Court: Sustain the objection. Counsel, I will have to ask you not to continue this line of questioning. This conduct, we will have no more of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “argumentative, impertinent, and uncalled for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.