71 Wash. 2d 520 - Frisell v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 1997 · most notably 73 Wash. 2d 225 - Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc. (1968), Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co. (1987)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States · 67 Wash. 2d 948 - Moon v. Phipps · 67 Wash. 2d 957 - Farrell v. Score · 69 Wash. 2d 616 - N. Fiorito Co. v. State · 35 Wash. 2d 542 - Karle v. Seder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“explicit consent . . . based upon a full disclosure by the realtor of all pertinent and material facts within the realtor's knowledge bearing upon the transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“And, a failure on the part of such realtor to make the required disclosure and obtain the necessary consent amounts to a constructive fraud rendering the transaction voidable or the realtor otherwise liable at the instance of the principal, .... Thus, where it appears that such a realtor has, directly or indirectly, purchased or acquired an interest in his principal’s property, the burden of coming forward with proof of good faith, full communication of all known facts, and the informed consent of his principal rests upon the realtor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appellant’s evidence, disclosing the circumstances surrounding Mr. Van Meter’s acquisition of an interest in Mrs. Hooker’s property, established the essential basis for cancellation of the transaction or other appropriate relief. The burden of establishing respondents’ good faith, full disclosure, and Mrs. Hooker’s informed and unreserved consent to the transaction thereafter resided with respondents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Frisell v. Newman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.