State v. Contreras’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 99 Wash. 2d 501 - State v. Caliguri · 69 Wash. App. 465 - State v. Ferreira · 102 Wash. 2d 300 - State v. Martin · 101 Wash. 2d 490 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Piercy · 36 Wash. App. 699 - State v. Adcock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a disposition is imposed on a youth for two or more offenses, the terms shall run consecutively, subject to the following limitations: (1) Where the offenses were committed through a single act or omission, omission, or through an act or omission which in itself constituted one of the offenses and also was an element of the other, the aggregate of all the terms shall not exceed one hundred fifty percent of the term imposed for the most serious offense . . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether Mr. Contreras committed all the crimes by a single act is clearly indicated by the following test: Had he ceased acting when the first crime was complete, would he be guilty of any subsequent crime?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.