71 Wash. App. 48 - Condor Enterprises, Inc. v. Boise Cascade Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 107 - Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System · State v. Garcia · 118 Wash. 2d 195 - Taggart v. State · 118 Wash. 2d 476 - Hansen v. Friend · 114 Wash. 2d 271 - Marincovich v. Tarabochia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One who, in the course of his business, profession or employment, or in any other transaction in which he has a pecuniary interest, supplies false information for the guidance of others in their business transactions, is subject to liability for pecuniary loss caused to them by their justifiable reliance upon the information, if he fails to exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating the information.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“But when the misrepresentation is not fraudulent but only negligent, the action is founded solely upon negligence, and the ordinary rules as to negligence liability apply. Therefore the contributory negligence of the plaintiff in relying upon the misrepresentation will bar his recovery.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“To date, the Washington cases also follow the Restatement view that justifiable reliance is equivalent to a lack of contributory negligence. As a result, contributory negligence is a complete bar to recovery, rather than a trigger that causes the fault of plaintiff and defendant to be compared and apportioned.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.