Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Wash. App. 69 - Caouette v. Martinez

71 Wash. App. 69 - Caouette v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2010

17 state decisions

70199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · 92 Wash. 2d 576 - Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc. · 117 Wash. 2d 325 - Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc. · Beery v. Turner · 75 Wash. 2d 808 - Summerrise v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the cause of action shall accrue against any person who is a nonresident of this state, or who is a resident of this state and shall be out of the state, or concealed therein, such action may be commenced within the terms herein respectively limited after the coming, or return of such person into the state, or after the end of such concealment; and if after such cause of action shall have accrued, such person shall depart from and reside out of this state, or conceal himself [or herself], the time of his [or her] absence or concealment shall not be deemed or taken as any part of the time limit for the commencement of such action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... based upon incomplete, incorrect or conclusory factual information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We do not believe that a plaintiff's failure to notify a nonparty insurer of her intention to obtain a default judgment against an insured is a basis for vacation of a default order and judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.