71 Wash. App. 721 - State v. Ohrt’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 95 Wash. 2d 760 - State v. LaCaze
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A relative of a child ... is guilty of custodial interference in the first degree if, with the intent to deny access to the child ... by a parent... the relative takes, entices, retains, detains, or conceals the child . . . from a parent. . . and: (a) Intends to hold the child ... for a protracted period; or (b) Exposes the child ... to a substantial risk of illness or physical injury; or (c) Causes the child ... to be removed from the state of usual residence; or (d) Retains, detains, or conceals the child ... in another state after expiration of any authorized visitation period with intent to intimidate or harass a parent... or to prevent a parent. . . from regaining custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Veliz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.