Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

71 Wis. 295

Dawson v. Mead

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1888

Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 1888-03-27

<p>Foreclosure of mortgage: Filing notice of lis pendens.</p> <p>The filing of the notice of the pendency of an action to foreclose a mortgage is inoperative until the complaint is filed; and judgment cannot be rendered, therefore, until twenty days after the filing of the complaint. R. S. sec. 3187.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1896

2 state decisions

Relies on Flood v. Isaac · Olson v. Paul

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1888-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Cotjet.

¶1This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate. It was commenced by the service of a summons June 23, 1885. Notice of the pendency of the action was filed in the proper office July 15, 1885. The complaint was filed with the clerk of the court in which the action was brought, October 14, 1885, and upon the same day judgment-of foreclosure and for the sale of the *296mortgaged premises was entered. The defendants Mead and Butler appeal from the judgment.

¶2The judgment is premature. Seo. 3187, R. S., provides that such notice must be filed twenty days before judgment. Although this notice was in fact filed more than twenty daj'-s before the rendition of the judgment, yet, under the same statute, the filing was inoperative until the complaint was filed. It was so ruled in Flood v. Isaac, 34 Wis. 423, and again in Olson v. Paul, 56 Wis. 30.

¶3Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

/71/wis/295 · .json · Public domain