Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 71 Wis. 2d 462 - Westring v. James

71 Wis. 2d 462 - Westring v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
4
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 96 Wis. 2d 396 - Boynton Cab Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations (1980), Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission (2005)

62 state decisions

320197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scharping v. Johnson · 39 Wis. 2d 46 - Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & Development · 37 Wis. 2d 637 - City of Beloit v. Town of Beloit · David Jeffrey Co. v. City of Milwaukee · Smith v. City of Brookfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A delegation of legislative power to a subordinate agency will be upheld if the purpose of the delegating statute is ascertainable and there are procedural safeguards to insure that the board or agency acts within that legislative purpose.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"We are dealing here not with a delegation of legislative power to the judiciary but with a delegation of that power to an administrative agency or administrative director. The legislative agency or director is, in fact, an arm or agent of the legislature itself. The very existence of the administrative agency or director is dependent upon the will of the legislature; its or his powers, duties and scope of authority are fixed and circumscribed by the legislature and subject to legislative change. An administrative agency does not stand on the same footing as a court when considering the doctrine of separation of powers. An administrative agency is subject to more rigid control by the legislature and judicial review of its legislative authority and the manner in which that authority is exercised. * * *" "* * * "The power to declare whether or not there shall be a law; to determine the general purpose or policy to be achieved by the law; to fix the limits within which the law shall operate—is a power which is vested by our Constitution in the legislature and may not be delegated. * *" (Emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(b) Territory beyond the core. The territory beyond the most densely populated one-half square mile specified in s. 66.015(1) or the most densely populated square mile specified in s. 66.015 (2) shall have an average of more than 30 housing units per quarter section or an assessed value, as defined in s. 66.021(1) (b) for real estate tax purposes, more than 25% of which is attributable to existing or potential mercantile, manufacturing or public utility uses. The territory beyond the most densely populated square mile as specified in s. 66.015(3) or (4) shall have the potential for residential or other urban land use development on a substantial scale within the next 3 years. The department may waive these requirements to the extent that water, terrain or geography prevents such development.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.