Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 A2D 1218 - Commonwealth v. Smith

Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Raiford · In re Morris · Commonwealth v. Rios · Commonwealth v. Mudrick · Commonwealth v. Mehmeti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, this Court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, and we must determine if the evidence, thus viewed, is sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This Court may not substitute its judgment for that of the factfinder. If the record contains support for the verdict, it may not be disturbed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.