Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 309 Pa. Super. 16 - Platek v. Platek · 374 Pa. Super. 228 - Ciliberti v. Ciliberti · 388 Pa. Super. 214 - Malseed v. Malseed · 397 Pa. Super. 463 - Kozich v. Kozich · 428 Pa. Super. 332 - Hayward v. Hayward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such benefits are intended to compensate the employee spouse for lost earning capacity. They are paid in lieu of the earnings which would have been paid to the employee if he or she had been able to work. They replace the future salary or wages which the employee, because of physical or mental disability, will not be able to earn. They are comparable to Workmen's Compensation disability payments. Post-divorce payments intended to compensate for an inability to work are not marital property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]ll property acquired by either party during the marriage, including the increase in value, prior to the date of final separation, of any nonmarital property acquired ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Drake v. Drake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.