Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 A2D 674 - O'Connell v. Bruce

O'Connell v. Bruce’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2016

8 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Gowran · Kaya v. Partington · St. Germain v. City of Pawtucket · State v. Nordstrom · Chester v. aRUSSO

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Generally, whether what is done by a municipal legislative body is an ordinance or a resolution depends not on what the action is called but on the reality. * * * [W]here a resolution is in substance■ and; effect-,an .ordinance or permanent, regulation, the name given to it is immaterial.1 ] If it is passed with all the formalities of an ordinance it thereby becomes a legislative act, and it is not important whether it be called ordinance or- resolution.1 McQuillin, § 15:2 - at 110. ' , .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.