Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 A2D 92 - Delpopolo v. Nemetz

Delpopolo v. Nemetz’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2019

9 state decisions

50199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Warenczuk · Commonwealth v. Stair · 421 Pa. Super. 33 - Whyte v. Robinson · 418 Pa. Super. 231 - Meridian Oil and Gas Enterprises, Inc. v. Penn Cent. Corp. · 453 Pa. Super. 396 - Donnelly v. Bauer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to or during trial, but before the evidence has been offered. When reviewing rulings on motions in limine, we apply the scope of review appropriate to the particular evidentiary matter. The admissibility of evidence is a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and should not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.