Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 F.2d 49 - Fallis v. Ambach

Fallis v. Ambach’s Empirical Analysis

710 F.2d 49 · 1983

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2010

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. · Connecticut v. Mohegan Tribe · Karas v. United States · Battle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e are concerned here with the question of whether the State has an obligation to provide a certain funding level to an entire school to keep the school available as the placement for the appellant children ____ [W]e conclude that Congress did not intend section 1415 to apply so broadly____ A review of the legislative history of section 1415 supports the view that the procedural safeguards were established in an effort to prevent misclassification of individual children, and not to provide a broad avenue for challenging state fiscal decisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.