Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 F.2d 528 - United States v. Talbert

United States v. Talbert’s Empirical Analysis

710 F.2d 528 · 1983

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2011 · most notably United States v. McKoy (1985), United States v. Lewis (1986)

32 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

2101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chandler v. Roudebush · Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. · United States v. Miller · Borum v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if, viewing the evidence presented against the defendant in the light most favorable to the government, 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction, and the [prosecution's] evidence need not exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A defendant is entitled to a judgment of acquittal if the evidence produced against him is insufficient to sustain a conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.