Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 F.2d 947 - Chico v. Schweiker

Chico v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

710 F.2d 947 · 1983

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
March 2012
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably Salmi v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1985), Mcdonald v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1986)

27 federal appellate · 4 district ·

7501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381A (§ 1602 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Singleton v. Wulff · Hormel v. Helvering · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an impairment (or impairments) which is 'of such severity that' the claimant cannot, 'considering his age, education and work experience,' perform any substantial gainful work,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... a slight neurosis, slight impairment of sight or hearing, or other slight abnormality or combination of abnormalities.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.