Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 F.3d 1189 - Meyer v. Greene

Meyer v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis

710 F.3d 1189 · 2013

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo · Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co. · Horsley v. Feldt · Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a release of information that reveals to the market the pertinent truth that was previously concealed or obscured by the company's fraud); (2) showing that the stock price dropped soon after the corrective disclosure; and (3) eliminating other possible explanations for this price drop, so that the factfinder can infer that it is more probable than not that it was the corrective disclosure-as opposed to other possible depressive factors-that caused at least a”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “In our view, the commencement of an SEC investigation, without more, is insufficient to constitute a corrective disclosure for purposes of § 10(b). The announcement of an investigation reveals just that — an investigation — and nothing more. To be sure, stock prices may fall upon the announcement of an SEC investigation, but that is because the investigation can be seen to portend an added risk of future corrective action. That does not mean that the investigations, in and of themselves, reveal to the market that a company’s previous statements were false or fraudulent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a plaintiff must offer 'proof of a causal connection between the misrepresentation and the investment's subsequent decline in value.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.