United States v. Read’s Empirical Analysis
710 F.3d 219 · 2012
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Pereira v. United States · United States v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, [we] view[ ] all evidence ... in the light most favorable to the [g]overnment with all reasonable inferences to be made in support of the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.