Marin-Rodriguez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
710 F.3d 734 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Christensen v. Harris County · Jordan v. De George · Arizona v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(internal citations omitted) ); Guardado-Garcia v. Holder , 615 F.3d 900 , 902 (8th Cir. 2010) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Crimes entailing an intent to deceive or defraud are unquestionably morally turpitudinous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.