Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 F.3d 784 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

710 F.3d 784 · 2013

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Pirani · United States v. Bell · United States v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First, the court should assess the explanation the government offers of why confrontation is undesirable or impractical.” Second, a trial court should consider “the reliability of the evidence which the government offers in place of live testimony.” Ultimately, if “the government neither shows that presenting live testimony would be unreasonably burdensome nor offers hearsay evidence that bears indicia of reliability, the probationer is entitled to confrontation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While police reports may be demonstrably reliable evidence of the fact that an arrest was made they are significantly less reliable evidence of whether the allegations of criminal conduct they contain are true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “question any adverse witness unless the court determines that the interest of justice does not require the witness to appear.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.