Mamigonian v. Biggs’s Empirical Analysis
710 F.3d 936 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bennett v. Spear · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Hector Montero-Martinez v. John Ashcroft Attorney General of the United States · Gonzalez-Oropeza v. U.S. Attorney General · Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. California State Board of Equalization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Two conditions must be satisfied for agency action to be final for purposes of the APA: “First, the action must mark the consummation of the agency’s deci-sionmaking process — it must not be of a merely tentative or interlocutory nature. And second, the action must be one by which rights and obligations have been determined, or from which legal consequences will flow.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[T]here is no question that USCIS's denial of Ms. Mamigonian's adjustment-of-status applications is "final agency action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is expressly precluded by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.