Casale v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Given the City’s long history of noncompliance and routine apathetic attitude towards ending the illegal enforcement, the City has demonstrated that nothing less than the prospective threat of immediate and severe consequences will motive it to comply with the Court’s Orders. The City is therefore prospectively fined for each future violation of the Orders, payable to the Court. To ensure compliance in the long term, the fine shall grow progressively. The fine shall begin at $500 per incident of enforcement. Every three months thereafter, the fine shall increase by $500. The maximum fine shall be $5,000 per incident of enforcement.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 869 F. Supp. 2d 312 - Jefferson v. Rose

2. “The defendant, at 107 Main Street, Bay Shore, in the town of Islip, Suffolk County, New York, on or about March 14, 2012, at approximately 1:42AM, did loiter in a public place for the purpose of begging; in that the defendant was personally observed by your deponent leaning into a vehicle window stopped at the McDonalds drive thru and begging customers for money following a 911 call to that location complaining of the same.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 869 F. Supp. 2d 312 - Jefferson v. Rose

3. “lack [of] resolve to end the illegal enforcement [of unconstitutional loitering statutes] on its own,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 812 F. Supp. 2d 333 - Davis v. City of New York