United States v. Mandell’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Salameh · United States v. Torres · United States v. Colkley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[h]earings under Franks are not freely granted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the warrant affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires that a hearing be held at the defendant's request.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To be entitled to a Franks hearing, a defendant must make a 'substantial preliminary showing' that: (1) the claimed inaccuracies or omissions in the search warrant affidavit are the result of the affiant's deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth; and (2) the alleged falsehoods or omissions were necessary to the judge's probable cause finding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.