Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 FSUPP2D 689 - United States v. Stokes

United States v. Stokes’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Stone v. Powell · United States v. Calandra · Weeks v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Stokes had been fired from two Thai schools in one year for touching children inappropriately. His colleagues at a third school told investigators that he continued to engage in similar behavior. Stokes had a history of sexually assaulting ehildren[] and a criminal conviction for inappropriately touching a child in the United States. He was seen regularly hugging and kissing one particular male student. Two credible informants separately indicated that Stokes, an unmarried, middle-aged man, intimated that he was sexually attracted to children and boasted about living with young Thai boys. ICE Investigators also verified through cooperation with Thai authorities that a witness had, on at least one occasion, seen young boys reporting to Stokes’s private quarters.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.