Kuhfahl v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on King v. State · Franklin v. State · Morgan v. State · Wharff v. State · Dobbs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in determining whether a defendant is entitled to credit for time [actually] served [the relevant inquiry] is whether the defendant actually served any part of his sentence; that is, whether he was actually 'confined' for some period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Senn v. State“we cannot agree that home detention as a condition of probation constitutes 'time served.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Senn v. State“Kuhfahl was never confined and, therefore, did not 'serve time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Senn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.