Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 N.E.2d 925 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Ackerman v. State (2002), Allen v. State (2001)

33 state decisions

280199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Minnesota v. Dickerson · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it was reasonable for [the officer] to conduct the protective pat-down of [the defendant's] outer garments, because [the defendant] matched the description of a fleeing suspect reported to have fired shots just minutes before the defendant was spotted and detained by the officer”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. N.W. v. State · NW v. State
  2. “The admissibility of evidence is within the sound discretion of the trial court. We will not disturb its decision absent a showing that the trial court abused its discretion. Upon review of a trial court’s 'ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, we will examine the evidence most favorable to the ruling, together with any uncontradicted evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ackerman v. State
  3. “feels an object whose contour or mass makes its identity immediately apparent, there has been no invasion of the suspect's privacy beyond that already authorized by the officer's search for weapons,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Newell v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.