State v. Tate’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · State v. Straw · Taylor v. State · State v. Schoelerman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]efendants are no longer required to raise ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal, and when they choose to do so, they are not required to make any particular record in order to preserve the claim for postconviction relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We prefer to reserve such questions for postconviction proceedings so the defendant's trial counsel can defend against the charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.