Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2013
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Juneby v. State · Juneby v. State · Duncan v. State · Stock v. State · Neitzel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant may not be convicted under the statute for failure to provide support to his minor child if he is in fact financially unable to provide support and his poverty is not self-induced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lengele v. State“the accused either actually had funds available for payment of support or that he could have obtained such funds through reasonable efforts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lengele v. State“having the financial ability to provide support”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lengele v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.