Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 So. 2d 102 - Harriel v. State

710 So. 2d 102 - Harriel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Douglas v. People of State of California · Evitts v. Lucey · Gissendanner v. State · 503 So. 2d 321 - State v. Causey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a habitual violent felony offender sentence is imposed without record evidence of a prior conviction of an enumerated predicate felony, but without any objection by the defendant to the imposition of such a sentence, and the resulting sentence is above the statutory maximum without habitualization but below the statutory maximum period of incarceration after habitualization, is the sentencing error one that may be raised on appeal for the first time, and corrected despite the lack of any motion in the trial court to correct the sentence pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(b)?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Appeals following a plea of guilty or no contest are governed by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A), which provides that, following a plea, a defendant may appeal only those dispositive issues specifically reserved or, if no issues were reserved, the lower court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction; a violation of the plea agreement, if preserved by motion to withdraw the plea; an involuntary plea, if preserved by motion to withdraw the plea; and a sentencing error, if preserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Consistent with the legislature's philosophy of attempting to resolve more issues at the trial court level, we are also promulgating Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170( l ), which authorizes the filing of a motion to withdraw the plea after sentencing within thirty days from the rendition of the sentence, but only upon the grounds recognized by Robinson or otherwise provided by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.