Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

710 So. 2d 1047

Docket No. 97-1329.

Hart v. State

Jerome HART, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-06-03

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1999

4 state decisions

Relies on Estep v. State · 654 So. 2d 579 - Gliszczynski v. State · Loring v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-06-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Terri Leon-Benner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

¶3Before COPE, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Jerome Hart appeals his conviction for burglary of an unoccupied conveyance and the order of restitution. We find no trial error and affirm the conviction.

¶6Defendant-appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the $500 restitution order. This claim is not properly preserved for appellate review, because it was not presented in the first instance in the trial court. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). Loring v. State,674 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gliszczynski v. State,654 So.2d 579, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Bayer v. State,597 So.2d 870, 871-72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

¶7Affirmed.

/710/so2d/1047 · .json · Public domain