710 So. 2d 1357 - Culp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2012
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · Ex Parte Frith · United States v. Helton · 456 Pa. Super. 222 - Commonwealth v. Yanoff · 456 So. 2d 357 - Ex Parte Clare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The statement of specific grounds of objection waives all grounds not specified, and the trial court will not be put in error on grounds not assigned at trial.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“"At ... restitution hearings, the defendant, the victim, the district attorney, or other interested party may object to the imposition, amount, or distribution of restitution or the manner or method thereof and the court shall allow all such objections to be heard and preserved as a matter of record. The court shall thereafter enter its order upon the record stating its findings and the underlying facts and circumstances thereof."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"[R]egarding the argument that no evidence was offered tending to prove that the damage for which restitution was sought was caused by the criminal acts of the appellants, we note that the appellants entered negotiated guilty pleas. `If voluntarily and understandingly made, a plea of guilty is conclusive as to the defendant's guilt.' Matthews v. State, 659 So.2d 991 (Ala.Cr.App.1994)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.