Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 SO2D 188 - Holmes v. State

Holmes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. United States · Lowenfield v. Phelps · 498 So. 2d 472 - Warren v. State · United States v. Taylor · 567 So. 2d 456 - Gahley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “go back in there and do the job that you are required to do”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “more explicit judicial comments or significant coercive circumstances not present in the instant case, which would have made it futile or ineffectual in those cases, to have added a curative instruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he fact that no objection was raised to the instruction can indicate that the potential for coercion did not appear to be so to anyone on the scene.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.