710 So. 2d 729 - Zile v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Kastigar v. United States · Doerr v. Doerr · United States v. Helmsley · United States v. Biaggi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to execute her duty to protect the victim by standing by and allowing [her husband] to punish the victim so severely,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Conine v. State“there [was] no evidence that [a]ppellant participated or was in a position to stop it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Conine v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.