G.T.L. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Brown v. State · 431 So. 2d 342 - SW v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court determined that defendant's testimony was not credible and the state had presented sufficient testimony to prove defendant's constructive possession of the cannabis. The instant record supports the trial court's ruling that the state established that defendant knew the cannabis was within his presence, knew the illicit nature of the cannabis, and that he had sole or shared dominion over it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. NKW, JR. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.