Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

710 So. 2d 993

Hicks v. Chamberlin

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-03-27

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2016

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to set a hearing on his motion to dissolve a temporary ex parte injunction. We grant the petition.

¶2The petition recites petitioner’s substantial efforts in the trial court throughout February to have a hearing set on his two applications for same before filing the present petition to seek relief.

¶3The amended response does not dispute petitioner’s entitlement to a hearing on his motion within five days of the application as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.610(d).

¶4Accordingly, we direct the trial court to set a hearing date within five days of the issuance of this opinion. A rehearing will not be entertained.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.
/710/so2d/993 · .json · Public domain