Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 710 S.W.2d 912 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2018

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lockhart v. McCree · Grigsby v. Mabry · State v. Bolder · State v. Davis · State v. Nave

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “These cases establish the rule that where one inflicts an injury on another, he is guilty of homicide if the injury contributes mediately or immediately to the death of such other, and the fact that other causes contribute to the death does not relieve the actor of responsibility: State v. Butler, 534 S.W.2d 832, 835-836 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Williams, 588 S.W.2d 70, 74-75 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Daugherty, 631 S.W.2d 637, 640 (Mo.1982); and State v. Bolder, 635 S.W.2d 673, 680 (Mo. banc 1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although the [S]tate requested the death penalty, the jury could not agree upon punishment, and the trial court did not impose the death penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the way Muslims kill people — by tying `their ankles [?] to their feet'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.