Threet v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2010
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Courtemanche v. State · 169 Tex. Crim. 515 - Campbell v. State · 138 Tex. Crim. 368 - Irven v. State · 170 Tex. Crim. 509 - Chapa v. State · Wishnow v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“indecent exhibition of the person meant an exposure of those parts of the person which are commonly considered as private, and which custom and decency require should be covered and kept concealed from public sight.... We accept that definition and hold that it is sufficiently definite. Consequently, Section 104.01(2) is not unconstitutionally vague. Appellant did not have to guess at the meaning of this statutory prohibition. The public exposure of one's vagina was a clear violation for which she may be punished.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“permitting a person to expose his person”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.