Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 F.2d 161 - Adams v. Bell

Adams v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

711 F.2d 161 · 1983

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 26 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 944 F. Supp. 13 - Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture (1996), Kickapoo Tribe of Indians v. Babbitt (1995)

22 federal appellate · 26 district · 2 state decisions

29019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to supervise or dictate the details of [HEW's] enforcement program, once that program culminated in an administrative proceeding, itself subject to judicial review, against a recipient state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]here is a local interest in having localized controversies decided at home.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[O]ur purpose, and the purpose of the District Court order as we understand it, is not to resolve particular questions of compliance or noncompliance. It is, rather, to assure that the agency properly construes its statutory obligations, and that the policies it adopts and implements are consistent with those duties and not a negation of them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.