Otherson v. Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
711 F.2d 267 · 1983
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 56 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States (1992), Swentek v. Usair, Inc. (1987)
55 federal appellate · 56 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Ashe v. Swenson · Montana v. United States · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actually and necessarily determined by a court of competent jurisdiction”
23 later decisions quote this exact passage“the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Generally speaking, when a particular fact is established not by judicial resolution but by stipulation of the parties, that fact has not been 'actually litigated' and thus is not a proper candidate for issue preclusion.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.