Pryor v. Rc Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
711 F.2d 63 · 1983
Citation profile
106 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc. (1985), Kennedy v. City of Cleveland (1986)
106 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aldabe v. Aldabe · Sanchez v. Board of Regents of Texas Southern University · Lbl Sports Center Incorporated Walker Lml v. Bank of Cadiz · United States v. Lucas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t would be most helpful if the district court would advise a would-be appellant, and particularly one who is pro se, that his notice of appeal is untimely, thereby putting him on notice that some immediate action is yet required to secure appellate jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Myers v. Stephenson“[I]t is clear that a motion to extend the time must be filed no later than thirty days after the expiration of the original appeal period before a court of appeals can exercise jurisdiction over the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campos v. LeFevre“the date on which a notice of appeal is mailed may be considered by the District Court in determining whether there was excusable neglect, but it cannot cure untimely filing of the notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitmore v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.