Isom v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
711 F.2d 88 · 1983
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Cruse v. Bowen (1989), Basinger v. Heckler (1984)
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Withrow v. Larkin · Northcutt v. Califano · Simonson v. Schweiker · Weber v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n ALJ may disbelieve subject reports of pain because of inherent inconsistencies, so long as the disbelief is not based solely on the lack of objective medical findings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.