Singer v. Ferro’s Empirical Analysis
711 F.3d 334 · 2013
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Connick v. Myers · Garcetti v. Ceballos · Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District · Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, drawing all reasonable inferences and resolving all ambiguities in favor of the non-movant.” Singer v. Ferro, 711 F.3d 334 , 339 (2d Cir.2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). 5 . Of course, the district court’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether an employee's speech addresses a matter of public concern is a question of law for the court to decide ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the interests of the employer in providing effective and efficient public services” outweigh”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.