711 F. Supp. 988 - Gaballah v. PG & E’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2011 (Atomic Energy Act of 1954) · 42 U.S.C. § 5801 (Energy Reorganization Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 5851
Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission · Silkwood v. Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discrepancies between the 'as built' drawings, on which PG & E's seismic safety calculations were based, and the true conditions of the plant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“no evidence that Congress intended to do more than bar a federal remedy to employees who themselves violated the AEA [Atomic Energy Act].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“can hardly be regarded as pervasive federal regulation of the subject of employer-employee relations in the nuclear power industry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.