Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 N.E.2d 1238 - Conner v. State

Conner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Timberlake v. State (2001), Ben-Yisrayl v. State (2000)

2 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

400199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Lockett v. Ohio · United States v. Cronic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By choosing not to object to ... the State's closing argument, defense counsel avoided drawing attention to testimony or argument unfavorable to the defendant. This was a legitimate strategy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The record indicates that in the penalty and sentencing phases defense counsel's strategy was to humanize the defendant, an appropriate strategic decision. Defense counsel presented opening and closing arguments and testimony from several witnesses in order to present evidence of the defendant's background, including aleohol, drug, and family problems, his relationships, his good qualities, his employment history, and his relatively minor criminal history....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.