Russell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Dixon · Alabama v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tlwo sentences were imposed for the same injurious consequences, to the same victim, during a single confrontation.... Accordingly, Russell is entitled to relief on double jeopardy grounds employing the Indiana Constitution and its separate analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williamson v. State“look beyond the elements of the crimes and view the charging instruments, the jury instructions, and the proof at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williamson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.