State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2013
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · State v. Petree · United States v. Rowe · State v. Mills · State v. Kerekes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person commits theft if he obtains or exercises control over property of another by intentionally creating or confirming by words or conduct an impression of law or fact that is false ... that is likely to affect the judgment of another in the transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. LeFevre · State v. Doe“State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant has (1) obtained or exercised control over the property of another; (2) by deception and; (8) with a purpose to deprive that person of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bush“clearly support[ing] the conclusion that defendant's representations ... affected [the victim's] judgment ... and were in fact fundamental to the transaction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Doe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.