Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 711 P2D 685 - Urban v. Beloit Corp.

Urban v. Beloit Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2008

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

50198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ginter v. Palmer & Co. · Abrahamsen v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Benton-Volvo-Metairie, Inc. v. Volvo Southwest, Inc. · Primock v. Hamilton · Pueblo W. Metro. D. v. Se Colo. Water Con.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(l)(a) Notwithstanding any other statutory provisions to the contrary, all actions for or on account of personal injury, death, or property damage brought against a person or entity on account of the design, assembly, fabrication, production, or construction of new manufacturing equipment, or any component part thereof, or involving the sale or lease of such equipment shall be brought within three years after the claim for relief arises and not thereafter. “(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection (1), no such action shall be brought on a claim arising more than ten years after such equipment was first used for its intended purpose by someone not engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling, or leasing such equip ment, except when the claim arises from injury due to hidden defects or prolonged exposure to hazardous material.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “equipment used in the operation or process of producing a new product, article, substance, or commodity for the purposes of commercial sale and different from and having a distinctive name, character, or use from the raw or prepared materials used in the operation or process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.